Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay

Why College Athletes Should Be paying(a)$53.4 Million the combined salary of the top 15 remunerative coaches in division 1 college footb any, $0 the combined salary of either student-athletes. Over the past hardly a(prenominal) decades, college athletics have gained popularity across the United States. Whether it is footb on the whole, basketball, or baseball, ever since the turn of the century, intercollegiate sports have brought in a surplus of r eveue to their respective Universities. A recent study found that the University of Texas Athletic course had the highest revenue of any other University at a little over $120 million. Yet with this outstanding sum of money, NO college athletes are legally compensated for their work. According to NCAA rules, You are not eligible for booking in a sport if you have ever Taken pay or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport. period it may seem odd and unjust to pay college athletes, the reality is that compensation of such athl etes is a exigency not only to keep competition at a steady put in in college athletics, only when also to encourage students to graduate and get their college degrees. Student athletes should be compensated for their work, as they are the sole reason for the Athletic Programs surplus in revenue. These athletes are functional for the schools and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. Colleges are using these athletes to boost their respective reputations and bring in revenue while not compensating these athletes for their work.Everywhere else athletes are give, so why shouldnt college students too? almost critics may argue that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid indeed are becoming professional athletes. The minor union for baseball could be considered an amateur sport, although they do receive pay according to the teams revenue. Also, with all the time practicing and working in the classroom, how many athletes have time to actually get a muse? Another argument that supports paying college athletes is that these full-ride scholarships given to the best athletes do not actually cover all their expenses. Many athletes still cant afford to have their parents come to the stadium and watch the games. With all of the respect and publicity of these athletes, it goes unnoticed that a great deal of the players live very near to the privation line. Due to this lack of money, black-markets are created. Here, boosters that represent the University give these playerscars, spending money, or anything they truly necessitate, and in return, these players go to their respective University.There have been many instances of this before, one prominent example is that of Reggie Bush, the running back for the University of gray California from 2003-2005. Bush was paid by boosters to attend USC, which debauchd NCAA rules. Bushs mother was having distract paying rent for her apartment at the time in Pasadena. Bush felt obligated to take this offer, as there was no other way to make money and pay for his mothers home. These boosters actions are not only are illegal, but create rawness in competition amongst the NCAA. These universities that violate NCAA rules have an upper edge in recruiting top prospects. Schools are then tempted to violate such rules to even out the playing field.The last and arguably the most important reason to pay college athletes, is that it will check off that most student-athletes will tell apart their college degrees. Paying student-athletes would provide an incentive to stay in school and complete their degree programs, instead of leaving early for the professional unions Which brings me back to the question, Should college athletes get paid? If athletes are paid to play, not only can they cover some of their college expenses that scholarships couldnt, but also now they will want to finish their education. NCAA prides itself on all student-athletes are students first and athletes second, however, it seems that more popular athletes leave early for the pros.In college basketball, many freshman stars are referred to as one and done players as they complete one division of college and go to the professional leagues early, as they want money and need it as soon as possible. The enormousness of their education is lost. The University seems to be hypocritical in its actions when it doesnt pay its athletes, because it seems they support college athletes leaving for the Professional league early. One author suggests that every university pays the same flat rate to each college athlete for three years, and then offer a raise to senior athletes. This bonus will create that incentive for students to receive their degrees.While it may seem odd and unjust to pay college athletes, the reality is that compensation of such athletes is a necessity not only to keep competition at a steady level in college athletics, but also to encourage students to graduate and get their college degrees. The truth of the matter is that many college athletes are already organism paid under thetable which creates a black-market that is not only illegal, but is also unfair to universities that abide by NCAA regulations. Universities are exploiting these students and allowing them not to receive any revenue that they clearly earned. College Athletes Should Be PaidWorks CitedCollege Athletics. Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_athletics.Transcript of Informational Hearing College Athletes. Sacramento, CA, Senate Publications, 2003.