Comparison of Novel and Movie - Harrison Bergeron

Harrison Bergeron, by Kurt Vonnegut, is a legend equivalent no other. It is a story based on the porta of equality; full and on-key equality as they say. age the short story could make water been slightly weaken considering it takes on such(prenominal) a absolute topic, the movie rendition was solely unacceptable. It is a commonly hold upon pedagogy, that the book is always better than the movie, and this is one of the many cases where this statement shines. The movie, 2081, based on Vonneguts novel, wasnt as good as the book.\nIn, Harrison Bergeron, the calibres ar lively. It was simple to pee-pee a connection with a role; they had an influence on the analyseer. However, in the movie, the characters come outed stiff and over exaggerated. Also, handicaps were mentioned in the story as the enforcers for the thinker of equality. They were described in a way that make it seem like everyone was used to wearying them, and that this was somehow normal. The way they showed Harrison was a threat, was by mentioning that he had the belabor handicaps out of everyone in the world. However, in 2081, the handicaps all seemed forced. Harrisons handicaps made him seem like anyone else. Finally, for a story to succeed it must be good. Harrison Bergeron, succeeded the way it is, to occur the reader interested. However, it seemed as though the producer of the movie didnt quite comprehend that as he thought the access of a bomb, would make audiences more(prenominal) inclined to view it. It seemed as though the producer of the movie, snarl the need to change the story.\n passim the story, the characters were very approachable, and even fantastic at times. It made it easier to form a connection with the characters. It was such a doozy that George was white and trembling, and part stood on the rims of his red eyes. When you read about a character in pain, it is normal to mechanically sympathize towards them, and that is exactly what happens here. However, in 2081, when...